Tag: geology

Uncategorized

The division line of the West Volcanic Zone of Iceland

Steingrimur Thorbjarnarson

By examining a relief map of Iceland, key geological features become far more apparent than they would otherwise. One such map is displayed in the lobby of the visitor center at Þingvellir.

The main division line of West Volcanic Zone and its surroundings

A broken red line has been drawn to delineate the boundary along the western margin of the Western Volcanic Zone. This boundary can be traced continuously from north to south across the landscape. At its northernmost extent lie Hveravellir, a significant high-temperature geothermal field situated in the central highlands. Immediately to the west is Langjökull, beneath which two volcanic systems are located. Proceeding southward, one encounters Hvítárvatn, a proglacial lake that serves as a major outlet for meltwater from Langjökull and lies directly on this geological boundary.

Further south, the Jarlhettur form a row of hyaloclastite ridges aligned along the same divisional trend. This boundary corresponds to the interface between two mantle convection rolls beneath the approximately 120 km thick lithospheric plate. In addition to this division, deeper convection rolls boundaries are present, above which lies the Geysir geothermal area.

South of this part, volcanic formations of a different character emerge, including Laugarvatnsfjall, located above the lake Laugarvatn, pointed out on the map. These formations extend westward to Kálfstindar at the side of the Þingvellir graben, which follows the same orientation as the main boundary shown here. The geothermal activity at Laugarvatn is well documented. Immediately south of Laugarvatn lies the shield volcano Lyngdalsheiði. The boundary intersects the summit crater Þrasaborgir.

Notably, the hydroelectric power stations along the Sog river are situated on this boundary, marking a transition from highland terrain to the west to lower elevations in the east. The former waterfall Ljósafoss was located precisely along this division. Further south lies the mountainous region associated with Hrómundartindur, of which Reykjafell, near Hveragerði, forms a part. Here, deeper boundaries between mantle convection rolls extend westward beneath the Hengill volcanic system. South of this area, sharply defined structural boundaries known as Hlíð appear. These correspond in practice to the eastern flank of the shield volcano Skálafell and associated volcanic formations along the eastern edge of the Western Volcanic Zone.

In this region, the mantle convection rolls rotate in opposite directions. The western side coincides with the West Volcanic Zone, where one convection roll resists the northwestward motion of the North American Plate. In contrast, the area to the east is transported along with the underlying mantle flow. Consequently, the western region is subjected to continuous extensional forces, resulting in crustal rifting. This process is most clearly expressed in the rift valley at Þingvellir.

Uncategorized

Mapping Volcanoes to Mantle Flow in the Aegean Sea

Steingrimur Thorbjarnarson

The South Aegean Volcanic Arc, including Santorini, is one of the most active and famous volcanic regions of the Mediterranean. It formed mainly through subduction of the African Plate beneath the Aegean/Eurasian region along the Hellenic subduction zone. The arc includes, from west to east, the volcanic fields of Sousaki–Aegina–Methana–Poros; Milos; Christiana–Santorini–Kolumbo; and Kos–Nisyros–Yali/Gyali.

In the convection-roll model, the arc is highly symmetrical around the central axis of the Aegean Sea, and the model as well, while still being affected by the westward tectonic drift of the Anatolian region. The volcanoes appear to fall along specific modeled convection-roll lines. This close fit between a mathematical model and observed surface volcanism adds statistical support to the relevance of the model.

The volcanic alignment can be summarized as follows:

Sousaki, Aegina, Methana, and Poros are situated above the westernmost set 1.
Milos lies above the second set of downwelling lines.
Central Axis: Santorini and Kolumbo are located near the central axis of the Aegean Sea.
Nisyros, Gyali (Yali), and Kos are positioned above the easternmost downwelling line of set 4.

Within the South Aegean volcanic arc, four sets of lines are identified in the convection-roll model. However, volcanic centers are concentrated above only three of these. Notably, no volcanoes are observed directly above the line of the pair marked as number 3. Instead, volcanic activity, most prominently at Santorini and Kolumbo, is located between lines marked as 2 and 3, aligning closely with the central axis of the Aegean Sea.

This pattern suggests that the central axis may act as a preferential path for magma ascent. Similar axial focusing has been observed in other tectonic settings, such as Iceland (particularly the North Volcanic Zone), where mantle upwelling and crustal weaknesses combine to localize volcanism and high temperature areas along a central N-S aligned axis.

Within the framework of this model, it can be hypothesized that mantle material associated with line 3 does not produce surface volcanism directly above it. Instead, the flow may be laterally redistributed, potentially westward, before rising along zones of reduced lithospheric strength at the central axis. This would imply that the interaction between convection patterns and lithospheric structure plays a key role in determining the final location of volcanic activity.

This suggests that the division lines of the convection rolls play a decisive role in determining the exact locations of volcanic activity. The activity itself is, of course, initiated by the subduction of the African Plate and the associated processes. As in many other regions of the world, subduction creates a volcanic arc that is clearly detectable at the surface and is dotted with volcanoes. It is precisely at the points where the convection-roll division lines intersect this arc that volcanic centers appear.

In this context, the blue downwelling lines may also be interpreted as marking conduits for ascending magma. The term “downwelling” refers to the slow convection of plastic mantle material; however, along the boundaries between convection rolls, at the division lines, partial melting can occur. This process may create zones of weakness within the lithosphere, providing favorable conditions for magma ascent and, ultimately, volcanic activity at the surface.

Uncategorized

What We Learn from Ophiolites

Steingrimur Thorbjarnarson

Ophiolites are slices of oceanic crust that have been uplifted and exposed, making it possible to examine a cross-section of a tectonic plate. This provides a valuable opportunity to study the different layers of the Earth. There are many ophiolites, the most famous probably being those found in Oman and Cyprus. These were emplaced onto continental crust through obduction and are in some cases tilted or rotated.

After: http://www.gulfpetrolink.com/geoarabia/index.php/ga/article/view/31997

The uppermost ~5 kilometers of the brittle oceanic crust can thus be examined in cross-section. At the top lies a layer of pillow lavas, beneath which are sheeted dikes, followed by a gabbro layer extending down to the Moho discontinuity. In favorable cases, ophiolites also expose portions of the underlying mantle.

At the Moho, there is typically a transition zone composed mainly of two rock types: wehrlite just below the gabbro, followed by dunite. Beneath this lies the lithospheric mantle, which is composed mainly of harzburgite. This is a type of peridotite that remains after the original lherzolite of the asthenosphere has undergone partial melting to produce basalt.

Basalt originates from the asthenosphere at depths of around 120 km. The temperature of basalt at eruption at the Earth’s surface is surprisingly close to the temperature at which it originally formed. In Iceland, basalt may represent up to about 20% partial melting of the original lherzolite.

One particularly important feature revealed by the exposure of mantle below the Moho is the presence of conduits through which partial melt (basaltic magma) has traveled. These conduits consist of dunite, composed almost entirely of olivine. They form vertical channels leading up toward the Moho. This indicates that partially molten material can flow upward relatively rapidly, entering the gabbroic section immediately above the Moho transition zone.

The gabbro zone is commonly divided into two parts, with the lower portion showing layered structures. Within this zone, basaltic magma can accumulate in sills and magma chambers, where it may partially crystallize before continuing its ascent. When conditions allow, the magma rises again, typically vertically, through the sheeted dike complex, forming successive dikes.

As frequently observed in Iceland, such processes can eventually lead to volcanic eruptions at the surface. On the ocean floor, these eruptions typically produce pillow lavas. The vertical continuity and rather fast flow of basalt up through the tectonic plate can explain how it maintains temperature (almost) found at the depth of 120 km at the surface. This AI picture expresses the process:

AI-version of the ascending path of magma – not to scale.

The vertical movement of partially melted material through the tectonic plates can partly explain why division lines in the asthenosphere can be detected at the surface. This process continues over long distances, forming dikes of considerable length. Even more importantly, this ongoing process creates divisions around which different parts, often described here as polygons, can adjust to the tectonic drift that constantly alters the positions of continents and oceanic crust. Another contributing factor is the local horizontal movement, combined with the global tectonic drift trend, which can lead to localized rifting or pressure at the surface.

For mainland crust, the section looks slightly different for the upper most part. Again, this AI image can be made:

AI-generated cross-section of a continental plate – not to scale.

The result of this activity, which can be traced in mantle remains of ophiolites, can be detected on the surface. This is the map of Iceland:

Uncategorized

The 1.5° Spatial Sequence of Iceland

Steingrimur Thorbjarnarson

The Active South

Looking closely at southern Iceland, from the Reykjanes Ridge in the west to Öræfajökull in the east, a sequence of 1.5° spatial intervals can be observed. This pattern can be analyzed in detail, as many geological features align consistently within it.

Study area of South Iceland

First, the mid-ocean ridge forms a continuous structural trend, including a section approximately 900 km long. The Reykjanes Peninsula can be interpreted as a single volcanic zone, although its westernmost part represents a transition from a side-stepping arrangement of volcanic systems to a more continuous ridge structure.

Study area of South Iceland enlarged

Within this framework, a polygonal area can be identified that is densely filled with volcanic systems. A southwest (SW) division line within this polygon marks the location of the Blue Lagoon. At present, this line appears to provide a steady flow of magma into the crust, feeding a magma chamber beneath the area. When this chamber empties, eruptions occur along the Sundhnúkur crater row.

A dike intrusion and associated surface deformation have developed along a SW–NE trend, extending across much of the peninsula, from the southern coast toward the area near the road connecting Reykjavík and Keflavík Airport in the north.

To the east, the volcanic systems of Krýsuvík, Trölladyngja, and Hengill are aligned along the same structural trend. The eastern boundary of Hengill is marked by a clear slope known as Hlíð, after which other volcanic systems of the West Volcanic Zone (WVZ) continue along the calculated division line.

These intersections also define the western boundary of the South Iceland Seismic Zone (SISZ), which dominates the next 1.5° interval eastward, extending toward the volcano Hekla.

Hekla lies at a key boundary:

  • between the SISZ and the East Volcanic Zone (EVZ)
  • between the divergent tectonic region to the north and the volcanic but non-divergent region to the south

The southern region is therefore often referred to as the South Iceland Volcanic Belt, distinguishing it from the actively rifting EVZ. South of this lies the Westman Islands, which are sometimes treated separately, although they can also be viewed as part of a continuous volcanic system with the EVZ and the southern belt.

As in the West Volcanic Zone, the calculated division line clearly marks the eastern boundary of the EVZ. Across the region, the main volcanic systems consistently align with the pattern expected from underlying convection rolls. The division lines, their intersections, and the polygonal areas all appear to play structural roles. Even the north–south and east–west axes that subdivide these polygons seem to influence volcanic behavior.

A comparable polygonal structure includes the volcanic systems of Katla and Eyjafjallajökull. This has both:

  • an east–west axis from Katla to Eyjafjallajökull
  • a north–south axis running from Hekla through Vatnafjöll to Eyjafjallajökull

Eyjafjallajökull lies at the center of this polygon. The 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull can be interpreted within this framework: basaltic magma flowed along the east–west axis from the east into the volcano, triggering an eruption from a more silica-rich magma chamber with a lower melting point.

From the EVZ, another 1.5° step to the east leads to Öræfajökull, the highest volcano in Iceland. A narrow volcanic zone extends northeast from it along a division line. At this location, four inferred convection-roll division lines appear to converge. A similar structural role is observed at Grímsvötn, located to the northwest and also separated by a polygon of 1.5° span from east to west.

There are, of course, many additional details, which are explored in other posts.

Uncategorized

A Convection Roll Model of Earth’s Interior: Layering and Discontinuities – and Iceland

Steingrimur Thorbjarnarson

The map used below to indicate the location of convection rolls beneath Iceland is derived from this section of the Earth’s layers. Tracing the process from the consistent thickness of each layer to the exact location of the convection rolls—and thereby constructing a three-dimensional model of the Earth—is, of course, a complex and lengthy task. With this map, however, meaningful comparisons can be made, and a few are outlined below.

Convection roll model showing the discontinuities at 120, 410, and 670 km, along with the relevant layers;
the lower mantle contains two sets of rolls, each 15° wide.

A geological map of Iceland can then be compared with the model:

Map base: https://jokull.jorfi.is/articles/jokull2008.58/jokull2008.58.197.pdf

This map shows the location of both the Reykjanes Ridge and the Kolbeinsey Ridge. Although the map is a simplification and is neither fully accurate nor perfectly aligned with the calculated grid, a few features can still be immediately observed:

1. Volcanic zones match the grid.
Those familiar with the geology of Iceland will notice that the sharp boundaries of the volcanic zones correspond closely with the division lines between convection rolls. The distinction between upwelling and downwelling also clearly influences the distribution of these volcanic zones. Furthermore, the pattern defined by the division lines has explanatory value: the differing orientations of the East Volcanic Zone and the North Volcanic Zone are consistent with the distinct grid patterns observed in the southern and northern halves of Iceland.

2. Seismic zones match the grid.
The South Iceland Seismic Zone, as identified through geophysical measurements, is located between Hekla and Hveragerði, precisely within one of the polygons defined by the grid. The Tjörnes Fracture Zone also aligns with the division-line pattern observed along the northern coast.

3. Distribution of geothermal areas.
The distribution of geothermal areas also corresponds with the model. Low-temperature areas are associated with specific polygons and tend to cluster within them. In contrast, high-temperature areas are associated with division lines, their intersections, and the boundary between the Eurasian Plate and the North American Plate.

4. Local tectonic alignment within polygons.
Tectonic features within the polygons, such as volcanic fissures, are aligned according to the geometry of each polygon, reflecting the structure imposed by the convection rolls. These alignments do not follow the general direction of plate motion, suggesting that the model explains a major structural trend not accounted for in previous models.

5. NW–SE and NE–SW fissure patterns.
In some cases, fissures exhibit a NW–SE alignment consistent with the mirrored structure of the underlying convection rolls. Different layers display different roll orientations, while maintaining symmetry relative to the north–south axis. The coexistence of NW–SE and NE–SW trends has not been satisfactorily explained by other models.

Many additional aspects of consistency between the model and surface expressions have been discussed here.