Uncategorized

Iceland and the convection rolls model

Snæfellsjökull

There are many ways in which Iceland can be meaningfully compared with the mantle convection-rolls model. When viewed from a holistic, bird’s-eye perspective, the pattern of the continental shelf, the mid-ocean ridges, and the position of Iceland’s stratovolcanoes together reveal a coherent geological structure. To understand this fully, it is necessary to recognize both the location and the function of the major convection rolls operating beneath Iceland. In this model, the rolls do not have fixed “axes”; instead, they sway according to their governing equations. Therefore, the true geological significance lies in the division boundaries between adjacent rolls. These boundaries, when projected through the mantle and lithosphere, naturally delimit Iceland’s volcanic zones and help explain their geometry.

Spjald a syningu
Convection rolls arrangement at 64°N

Although Iceland’s brittle lithosphere is thicker than that of the surrounding oceanic crust, this is not a primary control on the island’s unusual activity. The key factor is the complex intersection zone where two long-distance convection-roll systems meet—one extending northward from equatorial regions and another extending southward from high northern latitudes. The interaction of these systems forms an overlapping polygonal pattern beneath Iceland, creating N–S and E–W patterns, such as the South Iceland Seismic Zone and the North Volcanic Zone. This convergence of roll-division boundaries generates the necessary preconditions for Iceland’s exceptional volcanic and geothermal behavior: enhanced mantle temperatures, increased melt supply, localized geothermal intensification, and mechanically weakened pathways that sustain the divergent boundary on land.

Within this framework, specific observations become clearer. Many of the best known geothermal areas closely follow the division line of the convection roll extending from the Reykjanes Ridge beneath the island. Yet they are not controlled by this single division line alone—the overlapping boundaries of other convection rolls also play a defining role. Several major geothermal zones lie precisely where these secondary roll-boundaries intersect the Reykjanes line. This is evident at Hveravellir, located where a northern roll-boundary crosses the central Icelandic system, and at Húsavík’s GeoSea geothermal field, which aligns with another such crossing point. Recent discoveries reinforce this pattern: the high-temperature system near Vaðlaheiðargöng (now supplying hot water to the Forest Lagoon by Akureyri) and the new geothermal resources near Keflavík both lie directly along intersecting convection-roll boundaries exactly as the model predicts. Other geothermal areas, such as at Grímsvötn and Kverkfjöll, are found along a parllel line, 3° east of the eastern margin of the said eastern roll of the Reykjanes Ridge convection rolls pair, also at crossings with other division lines of different depth. Such examples show that geothermal activity in Iceland is not random nor solely linked to one major upwelling line, but is instead the integrated surface expression of multiple interacting mantle-roll boundaries.

The volcanic zones can likewise be subdivided into natural segments that align with roll boundaries, and the tectonic drift vectors correspond closely with the grid formed by the convection-roll divisions. This allows a physically meaningful line to be drawn representing the true boundary between the North American and Eurasian plates—one that reflects deep-mantle dynamics rather than only surface expressions. Even the smaller peripheral volcanic zones align with the edges of adjacent polygons, occupying precisely the distances expected from secondary roll-boundary influences. In fact, all deeper rooted details of Iceland’s tectonic, geothermal, and volcanic structure can be understood by comparing it with the deep-mantle convection-roll system, which provides a unified and dynamically consistent model for interpreting the island’s geological complexity.

Uncategorized

Comparing Iceland and Convection Rolls System

There are many ways in which Iceland can be meaningfully compared with the convection-rolls model of mantle flow. When viewed from a holistic, bird’s-eye perspective, the combined pattern of the continental shelf, mid-ocean ridges, and the alignment of Iceland’s stratovolcanoes begins to tell a coherent geological story.

To make full sense of this, however, it is essential to understand both the location and the function of the major convection rolls situated beneath Iceland.

Once the geometry of these convection rolls is recognized, the division lines between them clearly mark the boundary limits of Iceland’s volcanic zones.

Numerous specific details illustrate this correspondence—for example, the distribution of Iceland’s primary geothermal areas aligns closely with the convection roll that extends from the Reykjanes Ridge beneath the island.

With this convection-roll framework in place, further analysis becomes possible, such as subdividing the volcanic zones into their natural segments and comparing the intensity and style of activity within each one.

The tectonic drift vectors across Iceland can also be compared directly with the grid formed by the convection-roll boundaries. This allows an accurate, physically meaningful line to be drawn representing the division between the North American and Eurasian plates.

In turn, Iceland’s smaller peripheral volcanic zones can be examined in this context.

These zones tend to occupy the regions between the edges of adjacent convection-roll polygons. In fact, virtually every detail of Iceland’s tectonics, geothermal distribution, and volcanic structure can be actively compared—and consistently correlated—with this convection-roll system. This approach provides a unified model that connects deep-mantle dynamics with the observable geological features on the surface.

Uncategorized

The Regular Distribution of Outstanding Features of Iceland

Many of the famous volcanic and geothermal areas in Iceland are distributed in a very regular pattern:

When we trace three specific latitudinal bands across Iceland, a striking regularity emerges in the distribution of volcanic and geothermal areas. These zones appear to align with key boundaries in Iceland’s underlying mantle-convection structure.

1. The ~64°48′N Parallel
Along approximately 64°48′N, several well-known volcanic and geothermal sites fall in a remarkably linear arrangement. Snæfellsjökull (64°48′32″N) lies on this line, and further east we encounter Reykholtsdalur, Hveravellir, the East Volcanic zone – Mid Volcanic Belt (EVZ–MVB) division point, Kverkfjöll, and Snæfell. The fact that such major and geographically separated systems cluster around the same latitude suggests that their positions are not random; they coincide with an underlying structural feature in the mantle.

2. The ~64°19′N Parallel
Geysir is located at 64°18′49″N, and 3° of longitude to the east lies Grímsvötn, one of Iceland’s most active volcanic centers. This west–east correspondence hints that these two sites sit along the same deep-seated mantle boundary, where material upwelling or shear occurs as adjacent convection rolls interact.

3. The ~64°00′N Parallel
A third set of volcanic features—Hveragerði, Hekla, Laki, and Öræfajökull—also display a regular spacing. Each lies approximately 1.5° apart along the 64th parallel. These evenly spaced intervals are consistent with boundary intersections between mantle convection rolls. cells.

How These Parallels Fit Together

When plotted on a map, these three latitudinal bands exhibit a coherent geometric relationship. Rather than being isolated curiosities, they form a patterned framework that mirrors the predicted arrangement of convection rolls of the upper mantle. In the model, Iceland sits above the junction of several long, ribbon-like convection structures that rise and sink in a repeating pattern. Where roll boundaries intersect, and special structures or divisions are found on the surface, it can be regarded as a theoretical explanation of the relevant geological circumstances.

The Icelandic data align with this idea:

  • Volcanoes and geothermal fields cluster where convection-roll boundaries intersect.
  • Spacing is regular, matching the predicted periodicity of mantle-flow structures.
  • Parallel latitudinal bands correspond to horizontal divisions between roll layers, while the longitudes match the vertical shear boundaries between adjacent rolls.

Broader Significance

These Icelandic examples support the broader global pattern: volcanic, seismic, and geothermal activity frequently coincides with the geometry of the Earth’s internal convection structure. Iceland—sitting atop a spreading ridge and a major upwelling—is particularly sensitive to the arrangement of these convection rolls, making it an ideal natural laboratory. The observed regularities reinforce the hypothesis that the distribution of volcanic centers is controlled not only by shallow crustal processes or isolated mantle plumes but also by the deeper, long-wavelength organization of mantle flow.

On the map, a question mark has been added, namely at the Snæfellsnes Peninsula, where one spot seems to be missing within an otherwise regular row of active sites. What does that mean?

Uncategorized

The Geysir Geothermal Area and its Vapour Reservoir

People stand there all day:

The geyser Strokkur in Iceland

The location of the Icelandic Geysir is above the lower mantle division lines, as seen below:

The location of the Geysir geothermal area in Iceland

Looking at the location in more detail:

A picture of the area can then be examined:

The Geysir geothermal area can be interpreted in a way that aligns naturally with the large-scale convection-roll model. The key is understanding how the regional structural geometry, the local fracture network, and the three-dimensional vapour reservoir interact. The area lies above two NW–SE-aligned division lines, which in the model represent boundaries between adjacent mantle-flow rolls. Such deep division lines tend to produce changes in the crustal stress field, zones of enhanced fracturing, and focused pathways for magmatic and hydrothermal fluids. It is therefore not surprising that the surface geothermal activity in Haukadalur is concentrated precisely where these boundaries intersect the crust.

These NW–SE structures meet and interfere with the dominant NE–SW trend of the West Volcanic Zone. The WVZ imposes the main tectonic and volcanic orientation in this part of Iceland, and when the two systems interact—one NE–SW, the other NW–SE—the result is a structurally complex zone with increased fracture permeability. Where these deep-rooted structural trends overlap, hydrothermal fluids can move more easily, leading to the clustering of geysers, steaming ground, and other geothermal features that characterise the Geysir field.

Recent geophysical imaging supports this interpretation by revealing that the vapour-dominated reservoir beneath the Geysir area stretches NW–SE. This alignment is significant: it matches the orientation of the proposed deep division lines and also cuts across the local anomaly long thought to reflect a fault or fracture connecting Geysir and Strokkur. Instead of a simple linear fault feeding the two geysers, the more plausible interpretation emerging from these observations is that the NW–SE vapour reservoir acts as the primary geothermal engine, while the Geysir–Strokkur line functions as a permeability pathway for warm water into this larger reservoir.

Viewed through the lens of the convection-roll model, the Geysir system becomes a clear example of how deep mantle-flow structures can influence surface geology. The NW–SE reservoir corresponds to a convection-roll division line, while the NE–SW orientation of the West Volcanic Zone reflects the regional upwelling limb of the roll, parallel to the main division lines, as shown on the maps. The interaction of these two trends produces the fracture architecture necessary to create one of Iceland’s most iconic geothermal systems. Rather than being controlled primarily by a local fault between Geysir and Strokkur, the system appears to be driven by the intersection of broader structural patterns inherited from deep mantle dynamics.

More about the vapour reservoir of the Geysir area:

file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/JGR%20Solid%20Earth%20-%202022%20-%20Lupi%20-%20Geysers%20Boiling%20Groundwater%20and%20Tectonics%20The%203D%20Subsurface%20Resistive%20Structure%20of%20the.pdf

Lupi, M., Collignon, M., Fischanger, F.,
Carrier, A., Trippanera, D., & Pioli, L.
(2022). Geysers, boiling groundwater
and tectonics: The 3D subsurface
resistive structure of the Haukadalur
hydrothermal field, Iceland. Journal
of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,
127, e2022JB024040. https://doi.
org/10.1029/2022JB024040

Uncategorized

Explanation of Why Iceland’s Highest and Lowest Points Meet at the Volcano Öræfajökull and Jökulsárlón (the Glacier Lagoon)

Iceland’s highest mountain, Öræfajökull at 2110 meters, and its deepest lake, Jökulsárlón reaching 284 meters, sit side by side on the island’s southeastern margin. Their striking proximity reflects more than coincidence: it reveals the intersection of several major geological boundaries that meet precisely at this location. The key to understanding this lies in two geographic lines—64°N and 16°40’30”W—which together frame a tectonic corner of Iceland.

Öræfajökull and Fjallsárlón

The 64th parallel is an important structural boundary across Iceland. North of this line, the East Volcanic Zone is divergent, but south of 64°N the South Iceland Volcanic Belt is not. The South Iceland Seismic Zone is also found on on 64°N. This shift happens along the 64°N line, and Öræfajökull lies exactly upon this transition.

The meridian of 16°40’30”W forms another significant axis. This longitude aligns with the central line of the North Volcanic Zone farther north. When extended southward, this same line passes directly through Öræfajökull. In other words, the volcano sits on a southern continuation of one of Iceland’s major volcanic and tectonic axes, even though it lies east of the island’s main rift zones and firmly on the Eurasian Plate. Its position makes it a tectonic outlier—disconnected from the active rifts.

The relationship between Öræfajökull and the volcanic systems to the north further reveals the underlying structure. At the northern edge of Vatnajökull, the volcano Kverkfjöll stands at the southern end of the North Volcanic Zone, positioned at what can be seen as the northern corner of a polygon, as seen on the map. Öræfajökull sits directly south of Kverkfjöll along the same north–south axis, forming the southern corner of that same convection polygon.

At the 16°40’30”W line, the drift vectors diverge in different directions, and near 64°N, the vectors also change directions, from NE to NW. Where these shifting vectors meet, the crust experiences a twisting or hinging effect. Öræfajökull is located precisely at this corner where drift vectors split and rotate relative to each other.

This combination of structural transitions produces the unusual pairing of Iceland’s highest and lowest points. At Öræfajökull, all the division lines between convecton rolls are concentrated at one spot, and by the resistance of crustal blocks caught at the hinge of changing stress fields. Just a short distance away, the basin that now holds Jökulsárlón lies in a zone of subtle tectonic sag created by that same hinge. As the Breiðamerkurjökull glacier retreated, it carved this weakened zone even deeper, creating a basin that today reaches far below sea level. Thus, uplift and subsidence—opposing expressions of the same tectonic corner—appear literally side by side.

Öræfajökull, one of Iceland’s most powerful stratovolcanoes, and Jökulsárlón, carved into a structurally lowered basin at the foot of a retreating glacier, together mark a location where Iceland’s tectonics, mantle flow, and glacial history intersect. Their juxtaposition encapsulates the geological complexity of southeast Iceland: a place where the island’s major structural lines cross, where mantle convection shifts direction, and where the twisting of drift vectors produces both the highest land and the deepest lake in a single, dramatic landscape.

Drift vectors of Iceland